![]() |
![]() |
||||||
|
|||||||
| Tags: beat, buy |
![]() |
|
|||
|
It doesn?t make sense anymore to repeat all the anxious questions why the hell
Adobe buried the better software, keeping the worse one alive. We are designers and producers in the middle of life, not small-minded bookkeepers talking about daily market share. We always just wanted to work with the very best vector drawing program available. It was, and it is called "Freehand". The web is stuffed with corresponding posts by countless, disappointed Freehand enthusiasts. Just let me focus on that tiny, little Bezigon tool Freehand comes with. For 20 years digitizing logos and letterings was quick and easy, just setting a few anchor points at typical positions, letting the Bezier routines draw the rest. Illustrator simply doesn?t have such a tool. It takes double and triple time to draw clean shapes with its cheesy, manual drawing tools. Does ADOBE want to sell amateur toys? Now they own the source code of Freehand. Everything?s finally ready to be dumped. In the case of PageMaker, ADOBE at least offered an InDesign version which had a built-in palette of PageMaker functions. So one could forget the old software step by step. Nothing like that with Illustrator. Eat it or die! I won?t eat it that way. Maybe the programmers at ADOBE are too stuck-up to admit that Freehand as a whole is the superior vector software. Here?s some advice to get round with that obstacle, using the Bezigon tool as an example: Yes, that tool could be implemented in Illustrator and RENAMED! Yes, it could also come as an optional plugin! Yes, of course, you could also let a third party developer do that job! Yes, of course, ... or PLEASE, sell Freehand to another company and let?em work on it and compete with Illustrator, like it was in the past. This would be sooo courageous, and we could love ADOBE again for giving us PhotoShop. Isn?t it love (and Freehand) we all need so much? ... |
| Sponsored Links |
|
|||
|
> It doesn?t make sense anymore to repeat all the anxious questions why the
> hell > Adobe buried the better software, keeping the worse one alive. But then you go on to ask those exact questions? In two posts? an hour apart? ;0) -Darrel |
|
|||
|
When I tried to post the first message my browser crashed, so I wrote another
one with the same content. Later I realized that the first message had gone through despite the crash. --- I didn?t ask those "market share" questions again because these don?t interest me. I made proposals how to save at least an extremely important FH tool which Illustrator doesn?t offer. Selling Freehand would of course be the best solution. Let users decide ... |
|
|||
|
We can?t elect another CEO, take over Adobe or keep shareholders from craving
for more and more profit. Our only option is to protest again and again. A company which doesn?t respect objectively based opinions of its customers of many years' standing will get into big problems sooner or later. What?s superficially right for business might turn out to be completely wrong for customer satisfaction ... By the way, it?s also about OUR money and OUR time we invested into Freehand for so long. |
|
|||
|
Gotta add a very interesting note to the "Bezigon tool" matter I discussed
above. Read this statement entitled "What's the Difference Between the Bezigon Tool and the Pen Tool? ... These Pen tool features make FreeHand's Pen tool the most elegant and refined tool of any vector drawing program currently available. With practice, you can draw virtually any path correctly the first time, without going back to edit curve handles or alter points." OK, where do you think that statement comes from? ... ... ... It?s an official ADOBE TECH NOTE you?ll find at http://www.adobe.com/go/tn_12226 Yes, they know it. But they don?t say it, and they don?t act. |
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
- Contact Us
-|-
Adobe Dreamweaver Forums -|-
Archive -|-
Top -|-Rules/Disclaimer-|-Help/Support-|-Advertise